Vendor Name Normalization Using Regex Patterns and AI | Tax Help Guy

Learn how to standardize vendor names across different sources using regular expressions and AI for accurate expense tracking and reporting.

2025-11-15 bookkeeping

The Vendor Name Chaos Problem

Look at these transaction descriptions from the same vendor:

AMAZON.COM*AB12CD34

Amazon Marketplace

AMZN MKTP US*AB12CD34

Amazon Web Services

AMAZON.COM PMTS

AMZ*Prime Membership

amazon business purchase

That'sseven different variationsof Amazon. Without normalization, your expense reports show seven separate vendors, making it impossible to track total Amazon spending or identify spending trends.

Regular expressions + AI solve this by identifying patterns and consolidating variants.

Building Vendor Normalization Rules

Pattern Matching Approach

Create regex patterns that capture all vendor variations:

Amazon Pattern

Pattern: (?i)(AMZN|amazon|AMZ\*).*

Matches:
✓ AMAZON.COM*AB12CD34
✓ Amazon Marketplace  
✓ AMZN MKTP US*AB12CD34
✓ Amazon Web Services
✓ AMZ*Prime Membership

Normalize to: "Amazon"

Starbucks Pattern

Pattern: (?i)(starbucks|sbux|sq \*starbucks).*

Matches:
✓ STARBUCKS #12345
✓ SQ *STARBUCKS COFFEE
✓ SBUX Store 456

Normalize to: "Starbucks"

Square Payments Pattern

Pattern: SQ \*(.+?)(?:\s+|$)

Extracts vendor name after "SQ *":
- SQ *COFFEE SHOP → "COFFEE SHOP"
- SQ *RESTAURANT ABC → "RESTAURANT ABC"

AI-Enhanced Normalization

Combining Regex with AI Intelligence

Use regex to pre-filter, AI to make intelligent decisions:

Hybrid Approach Prompt:

"I have these vendor variations. Using the regex pattern(AMZN|amazon|AMZ).*, I've identified these as Amazon:



- AMAZON.COM*AB12CD34

- AMZN MKTP US*AB12CD34

- Amazon Web Services



Should all be normalized to 'Amazon', or should 'Amazon Web Services' be separate since it's a different service? Provide business logic reasoning."

Common Vendor Patterns

VendorRegex PatternNormalized Name
PayPal(?i)paypal.*PayPal
Stripe(?i)stripe.*Stripe
Costco(?i)(costco|wholesale #\d+)Costco
UPS(?i)(ups|united parcel)UPS
Verizon(?i)(verizon|vzw)Verizon

Handling Edge Cases

Multiple Locations

Should "Starbucks #12345" and "Starbucks #67890" be separate or combined?

Regex approach:Extract store numbers

Pattern: STARBUCKS #(\d+)
Group 1: Store number

AI decision: Keep separate if tracking by location matters,
otherwise normalize to "Starbucks"

Parent Companies vs Subsidiaries

AI can help determine relationships:

  • Whole Foods → Amazon (subsidiary)
  • Instagram Ads → Meta/Facebook
  • YouTube Premium → Google

Real-World Implementation

Google Sheets Method

=IF(REGEXMATCH(A2,"(?i)amzn|amazon"),
"Amazon",
  IF(REGEXMATCH(A2,"(?i)starbucks|sbux"),
  "Starbucks",
    IF(REGEXMATCH(A2,"(?i)paypal"),
    "PayPal",
    A2)))

AI Bulk Normalization

For one-time cleanup of historical data:

"Here are 50 unique vendor name variations from my bank statements. Group them into normalized vendor names. Use these regex hints:



- Anything matchingAMZN|amazon→ Amazon

- Anything matchingSQ \*→ Extract name after asterisk

- Anything matchingPAYPAL \*→ PayPal



Return a mapping table."

Best Practices

  1. Create a master vendor listwith canonical names
  2. Build regex patternsfor each canonical vendor
  3. Test patternsagainst 6 months of historical data
  4. Use AI to catch unmapped vendorsand suggest patterns
  5. Review monthlyfor new vendor formats

Conclusion

Vendor name normalization is essential for accurate expense reporting and vendor analysis. By combining regex pattern matching with AI's contextual understanding, bookkeepers can automatically standardize thousands of vendor variations, saving hours of manual work while improving data quality.

More Articles Like This

Coming Soon.

Anyone may arrange his affairs so that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which best pays the treasury. There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes. Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands.



Judge Learned Hand
Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit
Gregory v. Helvering, 69 F
Judge Learned Hand

Text anytime!

Joe "Tax Help Guy"
951 203 9021


Download my contact info